Sundial Garden

Sundial Garden

The Dilapidated House

The Dilapidated House

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Abstract painting Dec 2010

It is a small painting -- 12 by 16 inches.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Seven or eight years ago

Spent a morning at Botanic Gardens looking for trees I have drawn.

Those days of cloud gazing
Wearing t-shirt and jeans
Sitting on the grass
Drawing trees

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

"Is That A Temple?" Exhibition (2)

"Is That A Temple?" Exhibition (1)

Of all the works, my work is the least visually engaging work there, but I would like to think that it has more depth than some of the other works.

I don't think anyone would bother to squat and view the work (considering that it is rather inconvenient and my work is so wordy), but it's okay since the curator has very kindly included my work in the exhibition catalogue.

Friday, December 17, 2010

Is that a temple?

I am part of this group show.

It is on at Evil Empire, 48 Niven Road.
Dates: 17 - 22 December 2010 (excluding Monday 20 December)
Time: 3 - 8 p.m. daily

The work is actually something you can read in the post below, but you might want to just go down at look at works by other artists.

Friday, December 3, 2010

The Marne Road Temple Discourse

My proposed work for the “Is that a temple?” exhibition:

In this writing, the question of “Is that a temple?” is directed at three things: a) the building b) the body and c) the images.

The building

I cannot remember when I first discovered the temple at Marne Road. It was concealed by a tiny forest and I thought it was in ruins. The first time I wanted to go near it to take pictures, I saw two black dogs and I decided to go back another day instead.

It was two to three years later when I returned to the area. I deliberately took a different and longer route to avoid the black dogs. I made a detour round a canal and avoided the grass area.

To my surprise, I stumbled upon a red-light district near the temple. There were a few old uncles and foreign workers; not a single lady was in sight. The quarters had narrow passages lit by pink fluorescent tubes. I was afraid, I did not know why. Perhaps the black dogs would suddenly appear. Or perhaps it was obvious that I was at a place where I was not supposed to be. I quickly slipped my camera into my bag. Then I left the quarters and hurried towards the temple. There, I managed to take one or two pictures before I saw one of the black dogs a few metres away. I quickly left the place.

I never found out what gods they worshipped at the temple. I only guessed that it was a Chinese temple, for there was a brick joss burner. I never found out why there is a red light district near the temple. Perhaps someone more adventurous and daring can find out the answers to these questions.

The body

Is that a temple? I know for sure that the physical building is a temple, and it is neither abandoned nor in ruins. However, it is interesting that the temple is next to a red-light district where people sell their bodies.

The question of ‘Is that a temple?’ is now directed at the human body. According to the Bible (1 Corinthians 6:19 – 20), the body is the holy temple of God, and one should honour God with one’s body and not defile it.

Even though we do not sell our bodies and not all of us are believers, the idea that one should honour one’s body like a holy temple is worthy of consideration. What about junk food, smoking, alcohol, sleep deprivation, working overtime, slimming pills, plastic surgery etc.? It might be easy to point out that the prostitutes are defiling their bodies, but how are we treating our own bodies? What about your body – is that a temple? How do you treat it?

The images

I am digressing. Let me return to the beginning of the story. I wanted to take pictures of the temple. Here are two of the photographs I had taken:

In the first picture, the grass area and the forest seem to be the main subject; the temple is almost invisible. In the second picture, the temple is concealed by the vegetation, and the details of its architecture are not clearly visible.

Even though I had taken two photographs of the temple, it is not clear that the main subject of these photographs is a temple. Because the temple is concealed rather than revealed, it prompts the viewer to ask “Is that a temple?” when confronted with these images. One might be thinking that I was taking pictures of a forest if not for this written text or without the context of this exhibition.

These images were created as a result of how I viewed the temple, and the viewer’s interpretation of these images is influenced by this narrative-discourse. It might be of interest to the viewer that these images show what I saw when I walked past the area for the first time… …


It began with a walk which led to the discovery of a hidden temple. Photographs were taken, and the question of ‘Is it a temple?’ was raised and directed at the building, the body, and the images.

I do not want to end this discourse here, for there are still other issues to consider. We have not asked ourselves exactly what a temple is. Surely it is more than a building with unique architectural features? We need to consider the practices within a temple, as well as how the temple is managed. What if the priests and members of religious orders take advantage of their followers? What if there is a mismanagement of funds? What if a temple is managed like a multi-national corporation? Is that a temple?